How to reverse the fortunes of a declining business

According to Adizes, to get back to their Prime, aging companies basically need to go on a diet and get more flexible. To get their companies back in shape, owners and directors need to cut management layers, decentralize, hire talented people with fresh ideas, make risk-taking a cultural tenet, banish as many control systems as possible, sell off secondary businesses, and most importantly, refocus every person, process and ounce of organisational energy on the company’s products and customers.

The first step, of course, is to stop the denial that the company has lost its once golden position in Prime. Key decision makers identify and analyse only those problems that they believe they are able to manage and control. Owners and directors need to remove denial and get the group to accept responsibility squarely. A specific plan of action must be detailed with clarity on what, by whom, by when.

Secondly, the management team must be taught how to manage meetings and deal constructively with conflict.

The team’s attention is then drawn to learning how to empower the rest of the organisation to solve problems and deal with change. Without an organisational power change, there can be no behavioural change.

Units must then be established where units for change operate independently to units needed to produce results, eg. marketing and sales are separated.

Rarely does the rejuvenation process require a change of leadership. As the system changes, so does everyone’s behaviour. Read more of this post

12 things managers must do to create a great workplace 9 of 12

9. Doing Quality Work

Highly productive employees tell us there is a vast difference between being assigned to a team and actually identifying with that team. It’s a common experience — our manager assigns us to a workgroup and our name is added to the roster. Just because our names are added, however, doesn’t mean that we psychologically join the team, especially if we are afraid the other members don’t share our commitment to producing quality work. Helping all team members identify the characteristics that will result in a quality product can lead to greater efficiency and increased productivity.

Trusting that one’s coworkers share a commitment to quality is a key to great team performance and is one of the 12 key discoveries from a multiyear research effort by The Gallup Organization.

[Our objective was to identify the consistent dimensions of workplaces with high levels of four critical outcomes: employee retention, customer satisfaction, productivity and profitability. The research identified 12 dimensions that consistently correlate with these four outcomes -- dimensions Gallup now uses to measure the health of a workplace. An associated research effort, in which Gallup studied more than 80,000 managers, focused on discovering what great managers do to create quality workplaces.

When employees are asked, "Are you committed to quality?" they all answer in the affirmative. This reflects employees' natural, human tendency to think highly of the work they produce. Since the answer is always the same, however, the question does not differentiate the most and least productive workgroups. Much more revealing are the answers to "My associates are committed to doing quality work." Employees want their coworkers to share their commitment to quality, and want to be part of an organization that challenges and enables them to excel.

Often, the definition of quality sets the tone of a workplace culture. If quality is defined as the absence of defects or mistakes, we indirectly encourage employees to cover up mistakes or problems quickly, without drawing attention to them. In the best workplaces, managers realize that human beings will make mistakes, and can learn from correcting them. In these workplaces, quality is defined as the process of recognizing and solving problems. In healthy workplaces, employees understand that a customer's loyalty can actually increase if the employees take a positive approach toward problem solving. The best managers and workgroups do not scapegoat; rather, they see quality issues as a challenge to improve their product or service and, thus, to increase customer loyalty.

A problem can also bring out a greater sense of teamwork. Employees who are committed to doing quality work know that a problem can improve their team cohesiveness. They use the power of the team not only to overcome the crisis, but to correct the process to avoid future problems, and move on to greater productivity and quality. Interestingly, some of the most productive teamwork is observed during these times of crisis. The excellence and the spirit of teamwork that emerge from effective problem solving are the stuff of great workplaces.]

Please leave a comment, or phone me on 0412 921 292 if you’d like some help in your business to implement any of what you’ve read here.

10 biggest sales training mistakes and how to avoid 9 of 10

9. Sales Managers Aren’t Engaged in the Training

When sales managers don’t attend training it sends powerful signals to the sales team:

  • This isn’t that important…don’t pay attention!
  • The manager doesn’t believe in this training enough to want to learn the strategies and techniques and be able to help the team.
  • The manager is beyond learning…but the team is still stupid and needs help.
  • The manager would rather sit back at headquarters instead of being out on the front line with the troops.

We’re not suggesting that managers need to sit in the training class 100% of the time, but a regular presence where sellers can observe their participation is important.

Here are a few ways managers can make an impact by participating in any training programme:

  • Talk with the trainer prior to the course and find out how you might participate in a productive way.
  • Help the trainer observe role-plays and offer feedback.
  • Jump in and role-play yourself (willing to do what you’re asking your team to do).
  • Follow-up the program by forming small groups to begin implementing the strategies and techniques into real-life action steps.

A major part of our training programme is the making actual cold calls and it makes a great impact when a sales manager sits down and bangs out some calls right along with the sales crew!

If/when you are ready for some sales training that incorporates the sales manager, call me on 0412 921 292.

Incidentally, many sales managers choose training and trainers that allow them to avoid involvement.  Is that you?  Is that your sales manager?  Maybe the CEO needs to insist on involvement of the sales manager(s).

Comments?

Forgetting your customers could spell the end

Any time a company’s office decor becomes more important than its product, you can assume that the company is declining from its Prime. It’s beginning to age.

Companies slip into middle age when they start to lose their flexibility, when they lose their appetite for innovation. Of course, despite a company’s failure to continue to innovate, sales may continue to rise for a few years, thanks to residual momentum and its good name. However, these earnings often reflect price increases rather than rising sales and eventually those high prices will consume market share. With the company’s neglected research and development producing no new products or services, the aging company tends to spend its money unproductively on benefits, buildings, and dividends. Meetings lengthen because no one cares that time is being stolen from productive work, and form supersedes function. The finance department, with its focus on return on investment, has more sway than marketing, research or sales; the picture is pretty glum.

“If courage wasn’t a standard result of aging, it meant that the young could somehow acquire it as well.” Lawana Blackwell

The denial is organisational rather than personal dishonesty. Individually, people do speak about their fears and worries, but when they get together, their behaviour changes, and they act as if there is nothing to worry about. People recognise that the company has lost its vitality, but they are afraid to speak out. Panic sets in when, as has been inevitable, sales start to slip, and cash flow turns negative.

According to Adizes, the four stages of an aging organisation are:

  1. Stability,
  2. Aristocracy,
  3. Recrimination, and
  4. Bureaucracy, which then leads to Death. Read more of this post

12 things managers must do to create a great workplace 8 of 12

8. My Comapny’s Mission and Purpose

A deeply felt sense of purpose in life leads to excellence. Human beings want to belong to something of significance and meaning. They want to know they are making a difference, contributing to an important endeavor. The best workplaces give their employees a sense of purpose, help them feel they belong, and enable them to make a difference.

A clear understanding of how one’s particular job contributes to the company’s “reason for being” can be a powerful form of emotional compensation and is one of the 12 key discoveries from a multiyear research effort by The Gallup Organization.

[Our objective was to identify the consistent dimensions of workplaces with high levels of four critical outcomes: employee retention, customer satisfaction, productivity and profitability. The research identified 12 dimensions that consistently correlate with these four outcomes -- dimensions Gallup now uses to measure the health of a workplace. An associated research effort, in which Gallup studied more than 80,000 managers, focused on discovering what great managers do to create quality workplaces.

Employees at every level and in every function like to feel that they belong. Individual achievement is important, of course, but when employees of an organization feel they are an integral part of a larger whole, they are more likely to stay committed to that organization. All of us like to feel our companies stand for us, represent us, share our values, and have the same kinds of goals. It is more exciting to share a mission than to simply complete a task.

Every individual has a unique sense of purpose, and individuals find different meanings in similar situations. Thus, the proverbial mission statement does not necessarily help employees find a sense of purpose in their work. There is nothing wrong with mission statements, but they are often too vague and too broad to allow every employee to connect with them. Think about it. All employees, either consciously or unconsciously, ask themselves, "What is this company's purpose? Does this company look at the world in the same way I do?" Employees all want to know whether their purpose meshes with the company's mission. Because each employee looks at the world in a slightly different way, each comes up with a different answer.

Great managers continually strive to help employees understand how the company's purpose/mission directly relates to individual duties. This relationship helps employees find a connection between the company's values and their own. Every employee has different values. Some value competition, others value service, others value technical competence. Great managers translate the company's purpose into language that each employee can understand.

Outstanding workplaces never confuse strategy with purpose. Purpose is constant. It is the heartbeat of the company, and provides the company with power and guidance. Strategy answers the question, "How will we get to where we are going?" Strategies do change. In fact, companies constantly devise new strategies to find the most efficient path toward their business goals. The frequent evolution of strategies does not necessarily indicate a lack of purpose. Great organizations emphasize how new strategies support the broader organizational purpose. Great managers always help to keep the distinction clear for each employee.]

Please leave a comment, or phone me on 0412 921 292 if you’d like some help in your business to implement any of what you’ve read here.

10 biggest sales training mistakes and how to avoid 8 of 10

8. Companies Don’t Understand ‘Call Reluctance’ As the Silent Saboteur of their Sales Training Plans

Call Reluctance is a silent killer of sales careers and sales organisations. It will also sabotage your sales training efforts – leaving you scratching your head as to why sales results aren’t improving after all the training you’ve provided for your people.

One of the most common problems we hear from managers regarding their training is, “We still aren’t improving our results!” Chances are good that this sales team may have recently completed a two or three-day seminar on something like the “Art of Selling” where they learned tons of new strategies and ideas. Maybe they role-played several scenarios and watched well-produced video tapes. The results however, haven’t changed – pipelines are dry and sales are barely trickling in.

The problem is call reluctance. Salespeople are very susceptible to catching it, and the chilling part is, no one may even know this person is sick!

At these seminars, salespeople learn great strategy – all about how to qualify, question, present, answer objections, close and negotiate – but if they’re not making enough calls and filling the pipeline, all of that training is useless!

Managers buy training to help equip their people, but without addressing call reluctance, it’s like covering someone in band-aids who has a deadly blood disease.

The answer is not to stay away from strategy training, it’s to elevate call reluctance prevention training and activities to go along with it!

If/when you are ready for some sales training that is designed to overcome call reluctance, call me on 0412 921 292.

Comments?

This is what business success looks like

Companies in their ‘prime’ are recognizable: all aspects work well together, all operations thrive, and all members of the organisation know where it is going and how to stay on track. However, this state of ‘prime’ is an ever-changing condition, a segment of a journey, not a haven at the end of the road. Due to Prime being a state of equilibrium between flexibility and control, function and form, imagining and producing, innovation and administration, it is a state requiring constant balance. So hard to achieve, so easy to lose, the state of Prime continually risks sliding back to childish habits or stumbling into the rigidity of old age, warns Adizes.

A good way to judge an adult company is if it fails to produce significant new products or spin off promising start-ups within any three-year period.  Then it is either decaying, or on the brink of decline.

Of course, this rule of thumb varies by industry. In aerospace the cycle is much longer, whereas in the fashion industry it is much shorter. In the restaurant business, you must offer a new special every day, and change the restaurant’s concept every five years or so. In certain industries that are evolving at a breathtaking pace – electronics, biomedical research or telecommunications – product lifecycles last only six months to one year.

A company in Prime predicts trends correctly and is not attached to a single product line or market to the exclusion of any other. It develops and changes. For example, if Domino’s saw themselves as a company that delivers quality snacks quickly instead of a pizza company, they could have opened a new chain for bagels as pizzas were declining, and so transferred energy to the new endeavour.

“You always pass failure on the way to success.” Mickey Rooney

A company in Prime focuses on results with a ferocity that ensures that they will meet and exceed customer needs. The entire organisation shares a vision, encourages creativity, and performs with excellence.

But success hides danger. The Prime organisation suffers from a dearth of managerial depth and talent to match its opportunities for growth, and rather than confront the instability and challenge of Prime, too many companies ignore the signs of their degeneration and the process of management that produces those results. Like athletes at the top of their sporting events, companies in Prime face a questionable future: continued triumph or decline.

Of the two directions, decline is the more likely. Managers’ delusions about their company’s dominant position in its markets can bring about aging. What Prime companies need to do is to open their eyes to other possibilities while remaining within the range of businesses they know and understand.

Note, these diagnostic assessments of a company’s lifecycle don’t mention financial components. That’s because the financial picture may appear rosy – deceptively. To explain, a company’s financial statements capture individual moments in its history and are in no way indicative of the future.

So what does management look like at the Prime stage of business development? Read more of this post

12 things managers must do to create a great workplace 7 of 12

7. My Opinions Seem to Count

All employees want to feel that they are making significant contributions to their workplaces. The ways organisations hear and process employees’ ideas will shape, to a large degree, whether or not they feel valued for their contributions.

The need for employees to feel valued, to know that they really make a difference in their companies and organisations, is one of the 12 key discoveries from a multiyear research effort by The Gallup Organization.

[Our objective was to identify the consistent dimensions of workplaces with high levels of four critical outcomes: employee retention, customer satisfaction, productivity and profitability. The research identified 12 dimensions that consistently correlate with these four outcomes -- dimensions Gallup now uses to measure the health of a workplace. An associated research effort, in which Gallup studied more than 80,000 managers, focused on discovering what great managers do to create quality workplaces.

Attribute 7 is often referred to as employees' "internal stock price." It measures the sense of value that employees feel in their work and toward their organization. The degree to which a company's employees feel their opinions count is readily apparent to its customers. We have all encountered an employee who felt detached or insignificant, and we know the impact that employee had on us as customers.

If the ideas, instincts and intelligence of a company's employees are their sustainable competitive advantage, then employees' responses to questions relating to attribute 7 are of great importance.

Nothing is more demoralizing to employees than being excluded from significant decisions -- decisions that affect their jobs. Great managers consult with employees regularly to make sure those close to the action have input into critical decisions. This does not mean that employees have the final say on the decisions that affect their jobs. It does mean that when employees' desires and managers' decisions differ, the best managers explain the rationale behind their decisions. These managers help employees see the full scope of a decision and to understand the reasoning behind it. A straightforward explanation can build credibility and communications. Great managers never ask employees for their opinions and then decide to do the opposite without clearly explaining why.

Great ideas are the building blocks of increased efficiency and new product development. Great places to work, in which employees' opinions count, encourage great ideas to flow and be heard, and then processed and refined. Not all ideas will be successfully implemented, but the process of refining ideas is still wonderfully productive -- it builds employees' confidence in the company and shows them that their efforts can make the company better.]

Please leave a comment, or phone me on 0412 921 292 if you’d like some help in your business to implement any of what you’ve read here.

 

10 biggest sales training mistakes and how to avoid 7 of 10

7. Companies Don’t Insist on a Solid Return on Investmen (ROI) From Their Sales Training

For many managers, sales training is just another line item expense – “What’s it going to cost us?” Rarely will they approach it from the return standpoint with the question, “How much is this program going to create for us?” This is the question to ask when it comes to training, for if the return is always two or three times greater than the expense, who cares how much it costs?

The problem is, most sales trainers really don’t want to have this accountability conversation. Thy may talk in general terms about how training is “an investment in success”, and how you should “see some good results”, but that’s about as far as most trainers are willing to go down the accountability track.

We feel very differently about this issue. We feel that a client not only has the right, but they have an obligation to demand a solid, trackable return on their investment when it comes to a sales training programme.

Some of this return should be very tangible and trackable – watching indices like the number of new appointments booked, or closing percentages, or size of the average order. Such areas will have an immediate and very real impact on overall profitability.

Other return items are less tangible – pleasant side effects that happen with good training – like an overall more positive atmosphere, reduced labour turn-over, better relationships with management, etc.

The answer is to DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY from whichever training programme you’re considering. Together with the trainer, come up with four or five trackable, tangible metrics that you will follow to determine the success of a programme.

You may even suggest that the trainer tie a portion of their fee to the success of the programme!

This involves a bit of risk for the trainer, so the opportunity for reward should be there as well. Perhaps you can work an arrangement where you agree to pay 50% of the program as an upfront fee, and the remaining fee is tied to performance, plus a 25% bonus should you hit even higher numbers.

We feel that any training programme or trainer that can’t provide a solid ROI tracking process and be willing to tie compensation to results, doesn’t have real confidence in achieving success.  And if they wouldn’t hire themselves, should you?

If/when you are ready for some sales training with fees linked to performance, call me on 0412 921 292.

Comments?

Is your business struggling with its adolescence?

Much like an adolescent teenager, the adolescent company struggles for emancipation from its parent-founder, according to Ichak Adizes in his book ‘The Pursuit of Prime’. The stakes are high during this wrenching rite of passage: nothing less than rebirth as an adult. Brave, teary-eyed, scornful, scared, the teenager zigzags into a new sense of self. Although we can accept the teenage years as a normal transition from dependence to self-reliance, we need to remember nothing grows without a struggle.

As long as the company does well, expanding revenues and market share, the board regards the founder or COO as a genius with a golden touch. When, however, profits decline and uncontrolled activity brings about a succession of managerial disasters, the board starts to view the same leader as an unguided missile.

What is going on? How did the company survive the stages of Infancy and Go-Go only to arrive at Adolescence once again to do battle?

The answer lies in understanding the dynamics of systems development. Leaders of adolescent organisations want law and order, predictability, acceptance and ‘ownership’ of decisions. They want a constitution, but one they can stand above – free to break the rules by which others must abide – and this won’t continue to work.

So how to address this in terms of the 6 aspects of management? Read more of this post

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 83 other followers